<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>just an asterisk &#187; just an asterisk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justanasterisk.com/category/qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justanasterisk.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 00:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Things I don&#8217;t want to (or simply shouldn&#8217;t) write about &#8211; Jan 31 2010</title>
		<link>http://justanasterisk.com/2010/01/31/things-i-dont-want-to-or-simply-shouldnt-write-about-jan-31-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://justanasterisk.com/2010/01/31/things-i-dont-want-to-or-simply-shouldnt-write-about-jan-31-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppCraver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apptism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppVee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ars Technica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPhone OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod touch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanasterisk.com/2010/01/31/things-i-dont-want-to-or-simply-shouldnt-write-about-jan-31-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear reader, In a discussion about possible posts with some colleagues, I realized that there were subjects that you might want to know that I either donâ€™t want to or simply shouldnâ€™t write about.Â  I say shouldnâ€™t because itâ€™s not an area of expertise or more realistically â€“ someone has already written about it better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear reader,</p>
<p>In a discussion about possible posts with some colleagues, I realized that there were subjects that you might want to know that I either donâ€™t want to or simply shouldnâ€™t write about.Â  I say shouldnâ€™t because itâ€™s not an area of expertise or more realistically â€“ someone has already written about it better than I ever could. This post will be a mishmash of links to sites that do what I donâ€™t.Â  Hopefully, it will provide useful reading.</p>
<p><span id="more-1178"></span></p>
<p><strong>â€œWhy donâ€™t you write reviewâ€™s on iPhone/iPod touch apps?â€</strong></p>
<p>Iâ€™d love to but Iâ€™m neither qualified nor quick enough to write useful reviews.Â  I recommend two simple strategies for keeping up with the fast moving app market.</p>
<ol>
<li>Bookmark <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=best+iphone+apps" target="_blank">this link</a>.Â  I know it sounds silly but keeping a Google search of â€œbest iPhone appsâ€ will give you a simple starting point for iPhone and iPod touch updates.Â  As an example, Iâ€™m writing this on 1/31/2010 and the results I found were:
<ol>
<li>
<h5><a href="http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/0,28757,1823107,00.html">Top <em>iPhone Applications</em> &#8211; TIME</a></h5>
</li>
<li>
<h5><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/08/15/the-35-best-iphone-apps-of-the-year-so-far/">The 35 <em>Best iPhone Apps</em> Of The Year (So Far)</a></h5>
</li>
<li>
<h5><a href="http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/the-best-iphone-apps/">The <em>Best iPhone Apps</em></a></h5>
</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>Check the following sites periodically:
<ol>
<li><a href="http://www.appvee.com/" target="_blank">AppVee</a> â€“ simple reviews on nearly every app Iâ€™ve every looked forâ€¦</li>
<li><a href="http://www.freshapps.com/" target="_blank">FreshApps</a> â€“ a neatÂ  site where apps are ranked based on â€œfreshnessâ€â€¦</li>
<li><a href="http://www.appcraver.com/" target="_blank">AppCraver</a> â€“ similar to AppVee.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.apptism.com/" target="_blank">Apptism</a> â€“ another in the same vein (there are thousands of sites like this).Â  I really just liked the name.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>â€œWhy donâ€™t you write about the iPad?â€</strong></p>
<p>Ugh.Â  I donâ€™t have anything against the iPad, but isnâ€™t there enough hype without my rather weak thoughts?Â  If you are interested, each of the following sites has provided full coverageâ€¦</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://lifehacker.com/tag/ipad/" target="_blank">lifehacker</a> â€“ more than a few articles on the subject</li>
<li><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/tag/ipad/" target="_blank">techcrunch</a> â€“ a slightly techie bent</li>
<li><a href="http://arstechnica.com" target="_blank">Ars Technica</a> â€“ if you want the detailed analysis from all geeky perspectives (I couldnâ€™t find a tag for iPad on this one, but there are plenty of articles).</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>â€œWhy donâ€™t you do more male modeling?â€</strong></p>
<p>Just kidding.</p>
<p>Anyway â€“ this type of post might start to be a recurring segment on just an asterisk.Â  Keep the questions coming â€“ Iâ€™ll try to help in whatever way I can.</p>
<p>~ab</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/52c8ae40-dd32-4a66-9d73-f688d882cc07/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=52c8ae40-dd32-4a66-9d73-f688d882cc07" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related more-info pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanasterisk.com/2010/01/31/things-i-dont-want-to-or-simply-shouldnt-write-about-jan-31-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: How to choose a webcam</title>
		<link>http://justanasterisk.com/2009/12/12/qa-how-to-choose-a-webcam/</link>
		<comments>http://justanasterisk.com/2009/12/12/qa-how-to-choose-a-webcam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30fps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[completeness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connection speed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frame rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human eye]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[point of reference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical details]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video chat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webcam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanasterisk.com/?p=867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I received an email from my sister that said: I have a webcam which I never thought was bad but whenever I video-chat with anyone they always say it&#8217;s grainy and the picture is not very good.Â  So, I was planning on getting a new one and was wondering what to look for.Â  Is expensive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an email from my sister that said:</p>
<blockquote><p>I have a webcam which I never thought was bad but whenever I video-chat with anyone they always say it&#8217;s grainy and the picture is not very good.Â  So, I was planning on getting a new one and was wondering what to look for.Â  Is expensive always better?</p></blockquote>
<p>Great questions!Â  There are two major concerns with a webcam (other than price) â€“ Frames and Resolution.Â  However, before you think about buying something new, consider the following options.</p>
<p><span id="more-867"></span></p>
<p><strong>Connection Speed and other animals</strong></p>
<p>Although Iâ€™d love to tell you that getting a new webcam would do the trick, there are other issues that you should understand.Â  I found <a href="http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/04/how-i-got-skype-high-quality-video-working.html" target="_blank">a great resource here</a> with some very technical details.Â  However, before you dive into that, I would suggest trying the following:</p>
<ol>
<li>Make sure your camera plugsÂ into your computer directly (and not through a hub).Â  You donâ€™t want any other devices to share your potential speed.</li>
<li>Remember that <a class="zem_slink" title="Skype" rel="homepage" href="http://skype.com">Skype</a> video quality will be better after a few minutes of a call, so donâ€™t expect the best quality when you first connect.</li>
<li>Do a speed test of your connection at <a href="http://www.speed.io/index_en.html" target="_blank">Speed.io</a>.Â  A slow connection will make all of your webcam purchasing totally pointlessâ€¦</li>
</ol>
<p>If all that turned out fine, then on to the techie gooey detailsâ€¦</p>
<p><strong>Frames</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image38.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb38.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="240" align="left" /></a>I guess itâ€™s not much of a secret.Â  The more frames you have, the more times you get to see the <a class="zem_slink" title="Image" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image">image</a>, therefore the smoother the result.Â  The human eye does not process images  like a <a class="zem_slink" title="Video camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_camera">video camera</a>, so we donâ€™t have a â€œ<a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f80000000000523f9" title="Frame rate" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_rate">frame rate</a>â€ for our eyes.Â  However, just to give you a point ofÂ reference, at the <a class="zem_slink" title="Film" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film">movies</a>, we enjoy 25 frames per second (fps), while on <a class="zem_slink" title="Television" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television">TV</a> it is more often around 30 fps.</p>
<p>In the interest of completeness, I should add that the human eye makes all of this a bit complicated by adding a twist: a blurred image at a slower frame rate can look the same as a sharp image at a higher frame rate.Â  This isnâ€™t terribly important, unless you are planning to webcast from a moving car, but itâ€™s worth knowing that the subject isnâ€™t quite as simple as it sounds.</p>
<p>My theory, when it comes to <a class="zem_slink freebase/guid/9202a8c04000641f800000000009f693" title="Webcam" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webcam">webcams</a>, is that you want toÂ stream video, so youâ€™re looking for 30fps.Â  The good news?Â  Nearly all cameraâ€™s these days, over 10 dollars, have an acceptable frame rate.Â  All you have to do is know that frame rate exists and watch out for frame rates (if listed) under 30fps.</p>
<p><strong>Resolution</strong></p>
<p>Resolution is the number of <a class="zem_slink" title="Pixel density" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel_density">pixels per inch</a>.Â  What is a pixel?</p>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="400" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="200" valign="top">
<p align="center">A decent <a class="zem_slink" title="Camera" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camera">zoom</a></p>
</td>
<td width="200" valign="top">
<p align="center">A crazy zoom</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="200" valign="top"><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image39.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb39.png" border="0" alt="image" width="104" height="65" align="left" /></a></td>
<td width="200" valign="top"><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image40.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb40.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="132" align="left" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Do you see the little tiny red dot in my crazy zoom?Â  That is a pixel.Â  In a way, itâ€™s just a piece of color information.Â  Make it red (like in my example) and it causes a tiny defect in the image.Â  The more <a class="zem_slink" title="Pixel" rel="wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel">pixels</a> you have per inch of space, the more information is there for a computer to display.</p>
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" width="502" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="250" valign="top">
<p align="center">72 pixels per inch</p>
</td>
<td width="250" valign="top">
<p align="center">5 pixels per inch</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="250" valign="top"><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image41.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb41.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="240" /></a></td>
<td width="250" valign="top"><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image42.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb42.png" border="0" alt="image" width="244" height="230" align="left" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>So what kind of resolution should you buy?</p>
<p><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image43.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; margin-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb43.png" border="0" alt="image" width="132" height="244" align="left" /></a>Here are the options (as of the date of this post) on CNET.com.Â  352&#215;288 stinks.Â  1280&#215;960 rocks.</p>
<p>The thing to remember is that the resolution is simply how good the image taken <strong>could</strong> be.Â  Therefore a really, really cheap webcam that can pump out 1280&#215;960 may not be the best choice.</p>
<p>Also, watch out for â€œeffective resolutionâ€.Â  Sometimes a low resolution camera will tout itself as a better product by saying that with software, which they include, you can increase the resolution from the standard provided by the lens.Â  My personal advice would be â€“ try to find a decently priced camera, with good resolution out of the box.</p>
<p>Most internet connections cannot support the highest resolutions of todayâ€™s webcams.Â  However, getting a better top end may improve performance around 800&#215;600 (where most people end up streaming).</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>I hope this helps.Â  To summarize, you need to look for a frame rate near 30fps, although you might only stream at 800&#215;600 â€“ consider a higher resolution and finally, remember to check your connection speed.Â  If you follow those basic guidelines, you&#8217;ll beÂ fine with a mid-range webcam (at this moment between 30 and 60 USD).</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
<p>~ab</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=78649516-2c61-4d65-9a36-ce11c833388f" alt="" /><span class="zem-script more-related more-info pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanasterisk.com/2009/12/12/qa-how-to-choose-a-webcam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Q&amp;A: Setting up Gmail for Outlook</title>
		<link>http://justanasterisk.com/2009/11/09/qa-setting-up-gmail-for-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://justanasterisk.com/2009/11/09/qa-setting-up-gmail-for-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ab</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Q&A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geek level 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanasterisk.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/qa-setting-up-gmail-for-outlook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q: Bill wrote: I need to get some old emails from [my previous email provider] to be able to transfer them to Google so I can forward them to people. I can read and likely print the defunct notes, but can I transfer them to my Google email accounts? A: Thanks for the question Bill.Â  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: xx-large;"> </span></p>
<h2>Q:</h2>
<p>Bill wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>I need to get some old emails from [my previous email provider] to be able to transfer them to Google so I can forward them to people. I can read and likely print the defunct notes, but can I transfer them to my Google email accounts?</p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-large;"> </span></p>
<h2>A:</h2>
<p>Thanks for the question Bill.Â  The good news is that I have an answerâ€¦ the bad is that itâ€™s not super easy and there isnâ€™t a quick tool to help.Â  However, you can do it and Iâ€™m going to show you how.Â  There are three main steps:</p>
<p><span id="more-627"></span></p>
<p><strong>Step 1 &#8211; Enable your email to allow IMAP connections.</strong></p>
<p>IMAP is simply a way for your email program (like outlook) to communicate with your Gmail account (passing information like what folder a message is in and if itâ€™s read or unread).Â  The procedure is pretty straight forward.</p>
<p>To enable IMAP in Gmail:</p>
<ol>
<li>Sign in to Gmail.</li>
<li>Click <strong>Settings</strong> at the top of any Gmail page.</li>
<li>Click <strong>Forwarding and POP/IMAP</strong>.</li>
<li>Select <strong>Enable IMAP</strong>.</li>
<li>Save your changes.</li>
</ol>
<p>See that wasnâ€™t so hard!Â  Now for the next step.</p>
<p><strong>Step 2 â€“ Setup Gmail in your Microsoft Outlook</strong></p>
<p>It may seem strange that weâ€™re setting up Gmail in Outlook (when you wanted to setup your Outlook in Gmail).Â  However, this is the best way to transfer emails â€“ we just need to get the two services speaking the same language.</p>
<p>To setup Gmail in your Outlook, click on the following links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=77661" target="_blank">Outlook 2003</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=77689" target="_blank">Outlook 2007</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Itâ€™s not that many steps â€“ really the crux of the problem is the screen below (in Outlook 2003).Â  Be sure to follow the instructions carefully and you shouldnâ€™t have any issues.</p>
<p><span style="color: #666666;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image.png"><img style="border-bottom:0;border-left:0;display:inline;border-top:0;border-right:0;" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb.png" border="0" alt="image" width="404" height="316" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Step 3 â€“ Drag and drop</strong></p>
<p>Finally we come to the fun part.Â  Once your email from Gmail has downloaded from the servers into Outlook, you really have a combined portal for both your email accounts.Â  You can drag emails from one to the other!Â  I setup an example below â€“ I dragged an email from my outlook drafts to my Gmail account.</p>
<p><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image1.png"><img style="border-bottom:0;border-left:0;display:inline;border-top:0;border-right:0;" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb1.png" border="0" alt="image" width="404" height="232" /></a></p>
<p>And here is the result:</p>
<p><a href="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image2.png"><img style="border-bottom:0;border-left:0;display:inline;border-top:0;border-right:0;" title="image" src="http://justanasterisk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/image_thumb2.png" border="0" alt="image" width="404" height="222" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p>
<p>This is the down and dirty way to move email.Â  If you need more control over the result, consider using the folders in Gmail.Â  There are several other tutorials out on Google.Â  In my case, when I first tried this, I simply needed to get the data onto my Gmail account.Â  I didnâ€™t really care how.</p>
<p>I hope that this has been a helpful little tutorial.Â  Feel free to call out any problems in the comments!</p>
<p>~ab</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanasterisk.com/2009/11/09/qa-setting-up-gmail-for-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

